Informative Synthesis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Informative Synthesis - Essay ExampleHowever, the anticipated environmental concerns and possible health and life threatening puzzle are consistently increasing the inter domainal organizations condemnation on the towering nuclear energy in Iran. Indeed, the nuclear reactors tragedy in Fukushima Japan brought severe and lifetime effects that proved to be dangerous and inevitable (Greenpeace 1). However, the significance of this critical subject hails from the fact that the host nation is a minority nation with more economical interests than human or ball-shaped security concerns. Iran is thusly not in any way ready to compromise its quest in this construe. Actually, the urge to make their dream for a nuclear source of energy has only grown more real. Additionally, Iran has been concealing a ploy to develop uranium enrichment in its territories. Indeed, Iran produced 215 billion kWh gross in 2008 generating a per capita consumption of some 2000 kWh/yr. Out of these production, 80% of its electricity was from gas and 16.5% from oil. In fact, the nuclear energy reactor started up in Iran on 8 May 2011 through September 2011 after many years of construction and many consistent efforts against ever increasing global opposition. With 75 % production capacity realized in skirt, the prospects of the project oversee the project entering commercial operation about April 2012 (World Nuclear Association 1). Subject to these developments, the international organizations like the UN Security council and international governments like the US institute sanctions, trade barriers, and diplomatic withdrawals against Iran with a entrust of convincing or even coercing Iran to compromise on its credit line for Nuclear energy (UN Security council 1-12). However, condescension the stringent terms, Iran has not shown any signs of giving in to international pressure where they prioritize their economic interests on nuclear energy before international interests. This puts to question the mode of ratiocination-making that Iranian leadership adopts on matters of global concern like the nuclear energy. The significance of international pressure on nuclear energy in Iran is a relevant issue on the University of Alabama student. I addressing this topic, I will focus on opinion articles, Only Crippling Sanctions Will Stop Iran of March 2, 2012 by Emanuele Ottolenghi and Starving Iran Wont Free It March 2, 2012by Hooman Majd. The article, Only Crippling Sanctions Will Stop Iran of March 2, 2012 by Emanuele Ottolenghi is however more effective in that it draws the history of historic Iranian decisions, how Iranians value sanctions, what drives the Iranians to change and the respect accorded to the Iranian government by the Iranians. This will help in analyzing the effect of the international sanctions against nuclear energy in Iran. Emanuele holds the opinion that the occidental allies assume that Irans leaders are rational actors, and rely on cost-benefi t analyses to reach important decision (Ottolenghi 1). Hence, they assume that their continued gradual increase in the costs of Irans nuclear pursuit will lead to Tehran concession in the current nuclear standoff between the western decision makers and the Iranian decision makers. They expect the Iranian decision makers to behave rationally agree to a compromise and ignore Irans perspective on costs already incurred, the price of completing the journey and the advantages of turning back subject to the continued international pressure (Ottolenghi 1). The Iranian decision makers do not necessarily behave as assumed by the Western decision makers. History shows that the Irans decision makers are impervious to cost-benefit analysis and have never been isolationists. Hooman recognizes the fact that coercion, sanctions or exiles and their enablers